The above discussion highlights the difference between actual inclusiveness—allowing people who think, feel and live differently from the system to exist and thrive—and nominal inclusiveness, such as the tokens of equality of modernity.
In general, the nominal trap is about conflating between different things because they hold a similar name. For instance:
Philosophy as answering the big questions of life - meaning, death, love, truth, amongst others - versus the meaningless word games of academic philosophy
Programming for yourself, which gives you freedom and the opportunity to work on what you want, versus programming in a large company, where you must obey the conventions and restrictions of the company
The official message and values, and what is actually promoted. For instance, "we fight for freedom" = "we destroy enemies of the system" or "we're killing them to get the oil under their feet". Or, "we must protect our environment" = "you guys (not me) must be content with less, while we pretend that a green society is compatible with ever increasing profits"
Nominal happiness - pleasure, holidays, games, sex, food - versus actual happiness, which is more like a sense of belonging with others, feeling good in one's body and basically, saying yes to life. Yes, yes, yes to all of it!